The Coolscan image was scanned at 4000dpi, the Epson V550 image was scanned at 4800dpi, and the X-T3 is a 26 megapixel camera, although the capture was cropped, so it's safe to assume the effective resolution is a little lower than that. All images were processed without any additional sharpening (aside from the default sharpening that Lightroom applies to RAW files for the Fuji capture, which I've toned down by default). The three scanners I have are: a Nikon Coolscan V ED running Nikon Scan, an Epson V550 (which has the same specs as a V600) running Epson Scan, and a Fuji X-T3 mirrorless camera in a camera-scanning rig using a Schneider Componon-S 80mm f5.6 enlarging lens and processed with Negative Lab Pro. I chose the frame because the exposure is good, the focus is fairly sharp, and it's fairly grainy, so you should be able to see whether or not the grain is properly resolved. The frame I selected was shot on Ilford HP5+ and developed at 1600 ISO in Ilfotec DD-X. I recently scanned a frame of film to compare the three different scanners I have for someone on Facebook, and I thought it might be worth posting here.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |